I had a dream last night that President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Actually no, I got a text message early this morning about it, and I couldn’t believe it.
I thought, “Now? This year? No way.”
As I started to read the reaction online, that is what I got, from conservatives. I even curtailed my son’s “Handy Manny” watching so we could see the reaction on FOX News and CNN.
And it was not that all astounding. Those who like Obama said “Congratulations,” and those who didn’t said “Congratulations, but it’s because you have a ‘Chia Pet’ named after you.”
Even Obama himself was humbled. According to The Associated Press, the President said he wasn’t sure he has done enough to deserve the award, but would accept it as a “call to action.”
The tea party network, or conservative talk radio as others call it, asked what Obama had done and said he doesn’t deserve the prize.
“The real question Americans are asking is, ‘What has President Obama actually accomplished?’ It is unfortunate that the president’s star power has outshined tireless advocates who have made real achievements working towards peace and human rights,” Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele told the AP.
Steele shared a stage with Sarah Palin in Evansville earlier this year. Enough said.
Of course, the Democrat National Committee likened Steele’s comments to those the Taliban said earlier, but that’s not what my opinion is about.
The Nobel Committee sent a message to the rest of the world Friday and that message was: “Obama may not have done much, but he has done more than his predecessor ever thought of doing for world peace.”
The award, and the statement made with it, should be a barometer of not how much the world likes Obama, but how much the world hated the policies of George W. Bush toward them.
For conservatives, this should be a wake up call. Those squiggly lines and different colors on a map are countries, and we have to work with them.
For Obama, this prize sets the bar really high and maybe almost too high. Does the prize give him credibility or an unrealistic expectation? What if he brings unremarkable results?
I personally would have like to have seen Obama not win the prize this year. Let’s see if the Muslim world, Israel, the Chinese and others Bush honked off work with us again.
But, if he can bring the “teabaggers” and “socialists” together on health care, that’s worth the Peace Prize.
n Nate Smith will not be in Washington this weekend but will be at the Fall Festival in Evansville to work with his old fraternity buddies in a stromboli booth. E-mail him at nsmith@washtimesherald.com
Our Perspective
Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize? No way...
- Our Perspective
-
-
A time to remember, a time to reflect
It’s that time of year again.
-
Christmas and people on the other side of the economic table
My late father was a professional gambler.
-
Iowa isn’t the place to winnow candidates
The first real presidential showdown will be happening in fewer than three weeks when Iowa will hold its caucus.
-
The pig that popped my Christmas
My son has been asking for one thing this Christmas — a Pop the Pig game.
-
Tangled taxation
When it comes to taxes, Americans have a lot of disagreements.
-
Playing politics with an oil pipeline
When is a pipeline not a pipeline?
-
Report supports Murtha’s claims about Haditha
The final years of John Murtha’s life were stained by a controversy over comments he made concerning actions by U.S. Marines in late 2005 in Haditha, Iraq.
-
Pets and holidays are not always a good combination.
If you’re tempted to give a pet as a gift, my advice is:
-
These dudes are anything but cool
Steve McQueen and James Dean, two of the coolest cats to ever grace the silver screen,
-
Postal fixes won't solve problems
The U.S. Postal Service’s decision to reduce its first-class delivery time from 1-3 days to 2-3 days is the latest move to stop financial losses that last year totaled $5.1 billion.
- More Our Perspective Headlines
-
A time to remember, a time to reflect


